The Minister, the Goddess, and the Tea Table
Food for me has long been an obstacle to get through, one of the few vestigial needs of the human body that has not been tech-ified out of our lives. At best, eating at restaurants is a fun social occasion. It is a passive activity for talking to someone with, and comes with a built-in timer for when I can leave. Someone should do a linear regression of the food-quantity to time-left-at-restaurant relationship.
In my opinion, other mediums for conversation are far more enjoyable than the sluggish stuffiness of eating — like an adventurous walk. If I had my way, or had a time machine, all my long conversations would be had via a walk in the woods with a parasol in hand. Elizabeth Bennet would be proud. I always found it funny how privileged English people walked through the woods in their wool suits or fluffy dresses, and found it relaxing. The feeling of being toasted inside one’s wool suit aside, walking through weedy fields or past sharp thistles would definitely cause some damage to those nice clothes. If you were in a dress, holding up a dress the whole time and trying not to crunch too many twigs along the way doesn’t seem like the stuff of a very therapeutic walk. Maybe there’s a reason that part of Western culture got phased out.
So I guess I’ve come to terms with the fact that society has imposed food on me as the medium for long conversations. Well, I think I’m getting more used to it. Perhaps it might be the more time I’ve spent eating in HK, or the no-longer-in-college-lifestyle-diet I have. Whatever the origins of my improved relationship with food (and the way it holds conversations captive), I’ve gotten to know the foods and drinks here better. Tea-ing and dining has been a frequent part of my social calendar here, as colleagues and friends-of-friends in HK will often treat me out to one of the many unique elements of the cuisine here: yum cha (afternoon tea), claypot rice, or steam buns. Each food-related custom comes laden with its own history, whether it be political or social. Here are some of the biographies of these food-related customs.
I’ll start with table etiquette. Tapping two (or sometimes three) fingers on a table is a way to show gratitude for the person pouring your tea. The first time I saw a HK native tap two fingers on the table after being served tea, I was deadly curious and asked what it meant. Her eyes brightened, and she regaled me with a beautiful story. I heard the story a few more times afterward. People who knew I was an outsider seemed eager to tell the story. I don’t blame them. It’s a beautiful one, and one that I wouldn’t tire of hearing. Here I am about to re-tell myself! How meta. When an emperor visited the city disguised as a normal citizen, his servants (who were similarly disguised) would tap two fingers on a table rather than kowtowing to him to show gratitude when he served tea. The two finger tap prevented the emperor’s cover from being blown. Fast forward a few centuries, and normal people today also tap two fingers to express gratitude for whoever serves them tea.
On to mooncakes. Why do mooncakes exist? What do they signify? Why are they eaten during the mid-autumn festival? When I was young, I heard the mooncake origin stories in snippets. The snippets were always vague and hazy (even when I first heard them), and the stories themselves even more so. The snippets were only ever choice scenes that I never took the mental initiative to stitch together. Consequently, the image I have of them more so compose a kaleidoscope of scenes making up a fever dream rather than a concrete unit of knowledge. Well, having celebrated the mid-autumn festival in all its bright fanfare in Hong Kong, I can say that I still hadn’t achieved comprehension for why people eat mooncakes. I did some research on my own and patched up the holes of my childhood knowledge. There are two interpretations of the mooncake story. Both are legends, but one leans closer to myth while the other one at least tries to stay grounded in history. You can probably guess which one has my personal favor. The first one is as follows: a local hero used mooncakes to honor his wife, who was the goddess of the moon, by offering mooncakes and fruits during the time of the year when the moon was at its fullest. The story is far more colorful and includes a scene with ten suns, but I’d rather not compete in telling a story that has been told in better renditions in more legitimate areas of the internet. The second version goes like this: when China was ruled by a minority Mongol government, the ethnic Han majority used mooncakes to coordinate when they would revolt against the government. The mooncakes had different types of messages in different variants of the story.
The next story is one that I also heard often when growing up. And when I did hear it, I often smirked at the ridiculousness of it. The story is the origin tale of why we eat 粽子 (glutinous rice wrapped in bamboo leaves) during the dragon boat festival, and it goes like this: an exiled minister drowned himself in a river after hearing that the kingdom he formerly served was conquered. The minister used to be one of the kingdom’s few principled and valuable officials, but was pushed out because of court intrigue. Mind you, the minister’s wistful death was not what I smirked at — even child-me, impoverished of most senses, had some sense to know the tragedy and honor of his ordeal. What I did smirk at was the rescue operation conceived by the neighboring villagers. When the villagers found out the minister had drowned himself, they rowed boats into the river and pelted 粽子 into the water so that the fish would eat the rice rather than the minister’s body.
These stories are well-known across Hong Kong and, as a small aside, the culture of the Chinese diaspora I have experienced in the U.S. The stories are taught by teachers, recounted by relatives, and reinforced by the city’s sights and eats. These stories float through and make up a solid block of collective consciousness for the people here. It’s like a game of telephone except no-one gets its wrong, or distorts what is said.
I’ve long thought about these stories’ validity in relation to their ubiquity. The popularity and regard that these stories have seem impregnable to the many plot holes I often think of. So… we are eating mooncakes because a moon goddess had to down an elixir of immortality and then became separated from her significant other? When I’m with more familiar company, verbal utterance is oftentimes necessary to liberate that feeling of disbelief. The natives around me might smile, and then continue eating their mooncakes.
Well, perhaps the two-finger tap signal wasn’t so effective, and restaurant owners could detect from the dynamics of the room that their plainclothes guest was actually the emperor. Perhaps the restaurant owners knew the whole time, and kept up the act to give their leader an authentic experience — or out of fear of angering him. What if all these things were true? Tapping two fingers on a table is still courteous, elegant, and shows someone the esteem one might show an emperor.
Were mooncakes really the best way to pay tribute to a star-crossed lover? Or that the national insurrection against a military occupation might have required more coordination than messages in mooncakes? It is a time when family members return home to gather over a meal together, and after the meal, to split mooncakes together. The moon is high up in the air during a time when the autumn harvest is about to end. Mooncakes are charming, and bring families together.
Why do people throw glutinous rice into the sea to rescue someone who drowned? Will throwing really help the fish not eat the scholar? Wouldn’t throwing all that food just attract more fish? What if all this incredible logic really isn’t credible? The story itself — not its logic, but its heart — married food with helping others.
In my initial encounter with these stories, I was thinking the wrong question. It is not about validity. (After all, the truth-popularity R^2 value has never been a strong one.) But even though I was looking in the wrong place, an answer did find its way to me. These stories emphasize values rather than validity. At least, that’s the feeling I get when I eat, hear, and see the legacies of these stories in person.